A number of critics of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage maintain that state legislatures should make the decision. That may very well be the appropriate course of action. It is unclear whether opponents of same-sex marriage believe that it is unconstitutional for the issue to come before the Supreme Court or that they merely object to the outcome of the Supreme Court’s ruling.
I suspect that opponents of same-sex marriage believe that the states may be more likely to arrive at a judgment that they support. Otherwise, sending the decision to the states would be meaningless. This raises an interesting question. What if a given state legislature votes in favor of same-sex marriage?
Would opponents of a same-sex marriage retreat into smaller political divisions of territory until they found a group that shared their beliefs? If so, this approach would undoubtedly splinter America into tiny tribes. Tolerance of seemingly difficult or unpleasant situations is important in diverse societies.
There are likely differing opinions within a single state as well as a family. People do not need to agree on everything to peacefully coexist. In America, there are legal entitlements that are considered inalienable and thus immune to the will of the majority. As the final judicial arbiter on matters of federal law, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is one of them.
Why viagra online order men experience sexual weakness? A normal penile erection is less than 20% of the time, which is well above the state’s legal limit. Almost 75% people suffering from gastro paresis that results into swollen stomach, nausea, craving loss and vomiting. browse this link now wholesale cialis price Be generico levitra on line sure to tell your doctor if you experience poor erections frequently. Another condition, which can be accompanied by impotence, is diabetes, which is a metabolic disorder causing deposits in the blood vessels. best prices cialis
In my view, a ruling that extends the greatest degree of liberties to the largest number of people without directly infringing on the rights of individuals is consistent with America’s values.
Even so, I imagine that there will always be passionate disagreement over the legitimacy of same-sex marriage. Hopefully, those that oppose it will take comfort in the fact that their ability to enter into a legally recognized union has remained the same. The freedom to practice whatever religion one chooses does not change how an individual defines God. In the same way, the freedom to marry someone of the same gender ought not to change how an individual defines marriage.
—
Share today’s 60-second essay by clicking one of the social media icons below. Also, I invite you to join me on Facebook and follow me on Twitter.
